Sri Lanka’s Energy Illusion: Small Projects, Big Foreign Shadows

Sri Lanka is celebrating a 100MW, USD 140 million solar park as the “largest renewable project in history.” The truth is, this is not a mega project. Globally, countries like China, India, and Vietnam commission gigawatt-scale renewable parks every year. For us to call 100MW a milestone only shows how low the bar has been set.

More importantly, USD 140 million is not big money. Our own Treasury, state banks, or the Ceylon Electricity Board could finance it with bonds or a renewable trust fund. Sri Lanka has the capacity, the engineers, and the capital to deliver projects of this scale. What is missing is not ability it is political will.

Instead of building capacity, the government chooses the easy way out: invite foreign partners, package it as “FDI,” and call it progress. But foreign players do not come without agendas. Energy is one of the main entry points for geopolitical influence.

The United States entered through LNG with New Fortress Energy. India pushes solar grids, Trincomalee oil tanks, and cross-border transmission. China dominates coal and hydro. Russia leverages oil and fertiliser. Israel positions itself in digital energy and defense-linked systems. Each move is designed to tie Sri Lanka into long-term dependence on their infrastructure and supply chains.

This is why a small solar park gets exaggerated as a landmark. It is not about energy independence it is about keeping the foreign doorway open. Our leaders avoid the harder, sovereign path that demands accountability and long-term planning. They take the short cut, claim victory, and trade away strategic autonomy for convenience and personal gain.

Sri Lanka is not helpless. The options to fund and build our own energy future exist. What is broken is the political courage to take those options. Until that changes, even “small” projects will continue to be dressed up as historic while quietly handing our sovereignty to outside powers.

Jihan Hameed

THE NATIONALIST

EU & German Funded “History Museum” – A Trojan Horse in Colombo

On August 22, Prime Minister Harini Amarasuriya attended the opening of the “It’s About” mobile history museum at the Colombo Public Library. On the surface, this appears to be an educational initiative for children. But the truth is far more dangerous.

1. Who is behind it?

This exhibition is not a neutral cultural effort. It is:

Organized by NGOs – the Collective for Historical Dialogue and Memory (CHDM) and the Institute for Social Cohesion and Peace (SCOPE).

Directed by foreigners – funded directly by the European Union and the German Federal Foreign Office, with the German Agency for International Cooperation (GIZ) in Sri Lanka as their local arm.

Fronted by diplomats – the EU Ambassador Carmen Moreno and GIZ Country Director Nicholas Lamade personally attended, making it clear this is a foreign diplomatic project, not a Sri Lankan initiative.

2. What is its purpose?

The exhibition presents itself as “history after independence,” but its chosen themes expose the real agenda:

Nation & identity building – reframed through an NGO lens, casting doubt on Sri Lanka’s own civilizational narrative.

Conflicts – glorifying ethnic tensions, insurgencies, and war, while erasing the legitimacy of the state’s sovereignty and military victories.

Economy – used as a tool to highlight dependency and failure, while promoting external “solutions.”

3. Why target children?

The museum is designed with interactive activities that ask children:

“What is history?”

“Who writes it?”

“How should it be remembered?”

This is not teaching. This is psychological reconditioning. It pushes schoolchildren to question the authenticity of the Mahāvaṃsa, the independence struggle, and the legitimacy of post-war sovereignty — and to instead embrace narratives written by NGOs and foreign powers.

4. Why now? Why in Colombo?

Launched in 2019, the museum has toured 11 cities across 7 provinces. Its arrival in Colombo, with the Prime Minister herself attending, signals state endorsement for foreign-controlled memory projects.

This is part of a long-term strategy: to rewrite collective memory, frame Sri Lanka as a country defined by “conflict and failure,” and weaken the younger generation’s loyalty to their nation.

5. The danger exposed

This is not history. It is occupation by narrative.

Funded by the EU and Germany to reshape Sri Lanka’s memory.

Implemented through NGO contractors.

Given official blessing by the Prime Minister.

Targeted directly at children.

When foreign embassies fund “history,” they are not preserving memory — they are planting their version of it. Once this generation grows up with an EU-scripted understanding of Sri Lanka, sovereignty will not fall by force. It will collapse by consent.

History is sacred. It belongs to the people of Sri Lanka. Not to foreign embassies. Not to NGO contractors. Not to outsiders who seek to weaken our nation by rewriting our memory.

THE NATIONALIST 🇱🇰

Why Muharram Still Matters: A Call to Unity, Truth, and Dignity in Sri Lanka

By Jihan Hameed
Founder, National Alliance of Muslim Communities (NAMC)

As the sacred month of Muharram begins, Muslims around the world are reminded of the extraordinary moral legacy of Imam Hussain (RA). But for me, as a Sri Lankan Muslim and founder of the National Alliance of Muslim Communities (NAMC), Muharram is not only a time of remembrance. It is a call - a call to return to truth, to dignity, and to unity.

Imam Hussain’s stand at Karbala was not a political rebellion. It was a moral refusal. When asked to endorse an unjust ruler, he chose martyrdom instead. He gave his life, not for control, but to protect the integrity of the faith. That is why he continues to inspire both Shia and Sunni Muslims across the world  not as a sectarian symbol, but as a standard of unshakable principle.

Here in Sri Lanka, that message is more urgent than ever. Our Muslim communities are facing ideological confusion, social pressure, and quiet attempts to erase our voice in national life. We are told to conform, to remain silent, to trade dignity for tolerance. But Muharram reminds us that silence in the face of falsehood is betrayal -and that faith is not just ritual, but resistance.

The 10th of Muharram, Ashura, is observed by Muslims in different ways. Shia communities mourn Imam Hussain’s martyrdom with deep ritual. Sunni Muslims fast and reflect on the trials of Prophets before us. But at its heart, the message of this month is shared: we do not surrender when truth is on the line.

This year, NAMC urges all Sri Lankan Muslims to go deeper. Beyond sermons and slogans. Teach our children what Karbala really means. Don’t allow foreign ideologies or sectarian agendas to divide us. We are one ummah — and the lesson of Imam Hussain belongs to us all.

Let this Muharram be the start of a renewed Muslim consciousness in Sri Lanka. One that is intelligent, united, and fearless. One that speaks up - peacefully, but unapologetically - for the values that define us.

We must reclaim not just our history, but our future.

Correct the Narrative: Sri Lanka’s Elephants Are Not the Enemy

By Jihan Hameed
THE NATIONALIST 🇱🇰

On 19 June 2025, the Sri Lanka Army’s Eastern Command alongside 7 SLA, 12 GW, 3(V) VIR, and officers of the Wildlife Department and Mahaweli Authority conducted a joint operation to drive 26 wild elephants from Mivithapura to Nuwaragala. The official statement describes this as a success in “preventing crop damage.”

This is not a misunderstanding. It is a systemic failure.
The elephants are not the threat.

The real threat is the destruction of their habitat by humans.

What the government calls a “human elephant conflict” is the inevitable result of long-term environmental mismanagement, deforestation, commercial land grabs, and encroachments on ancient elephant migration corridors. These elephants are not “straying” into villages. They are being pushed out of their last remaining territory forced into survival patterns we then punish them for.

This is not a crop issue. This is a conservation collapse.
Elephants are a sacred species in Sri Lanka majestic, intelligent, and deeply symbolic. They are globally endangered. Their numbers are in sharp decline, and the forests they once roamed are now fragmented by highways, fences, illegal development, and so-called “economic zones.”

Every time we militarize a response to these animals, we risk sending the wrong signal: that elephants are a threat to national security.

While Sri Lanka’s military is globally respected for its humanitarian operations, disaster response, and logistical excellence, wildlife conservation must be guided by environmental science not security logic. The armed forces have a vital role to play—but that role must be supportive, not dominant, and always coordinated within a civilian-led national strategy.
Where is that strategy?

• Where is the elephant conservation master plan?

• Where are the protected corridors, the reforestation programs, and the long-term habitat policies?

We must stop applauding reactive operations and start demanding real ecological reform.

This is not just a battle between villagers and elephants.
It’s a failure of statecraft that endangers both.

The rural poor live in fear. The elephants live in hunger. The only ones safe are the policymakers in air-conditioned rooms with no conservation vision and no accountability.
This is not just about preserving elephants.
It is about preserving the soul of Sri Lanka.

Our Demands:

1. A National Elephant Habitat Recovery Plan backed by science and budget
2. Immediate halt to deforestation and land development in known elephant corridors
3. A coordinated role for the military under a science-led national wildlife strategy
4. Community education and buffer zone strategies for coexistence
5. Restoration of dignity in how we speak about our animals not as pests, but as sacred life forms tied to our identity

We call on the Government of Sri Lanka to correct its narrative, correct its strategy, and correct its duty. This is not conservation. This is containment. And the world is watching.

The question is not: How do we chase the elephants away?

The question is: Why have we left them nowhere else to go?

THE NATIONALIST 🇱🇰

Hameed Steps Away from Party Politics, Jihan Cites Doctrinal Clarity and Nationalist Reorientation

After more than 15 years of deep political involvement, respected political strategist and nationalist commentator Jihan Hameed has officially announced her exit from all forms of party politics. The move comes amidst growing ideological confusion within mainstream party platforms and what she describes as a critical need for sovereign clarity in Sri Lanka’s national discourse.

Hameed was long associated with the Sri Lanka Podujana Peramuna (SLPP) and worked closely within the political network surrounding Namal Rajapaksa. While she retains respect for the individuals she once worked alongside, she states that the collapse of internal discipline and the rise of mixed ideological currents have made it impossible to advance coherent nationalist policy through traditional political structures.

 

“Despite my influence, I could not contribute to internal party reform through policy. I had to use legal mechanisms, including Supreme Court interventions, to uphold what I believed was constitutionally right,” Hameed noted in her statement.

She emphasized that her departure is neither emotional nor reactive, but strategic:

 

“The platform has changed. I wish the party well as it continues building around Namal Rajapaksa, but I will not return. I now stand entirely with the nationalist doctrine- independent, public, and uncompromised.”

In recent months, Hameed has emerged as a leading voice in Sri Lanka’s digital resistance movement—issuing legal challenges, publishing analytical briefings, and driving large-scale public conversation on sovereignty, foreign influence, and cultural preservation. She describes her new role as that of a “civilian intelligence architect” operating outside the constraints of party politics to reintroduce doctrinal clarity into public life.

“I will continue to monitor every political party. But when sovereignty is at risk, I will speak. I have left politics, not the battlefield,” she stated.

Hameed’s exit reflects a wider pattern in Sri Lanka’s political landscape where disenchantment with traditional institutions is giving rise to decentralized, doctrine-driven movements led by individuals operating beyond conventional party lines.

Who will be the next Colombo Mayor? Decision tomorrow

The newly elected Colombo Municipal Council, following the conduct of the Local Government (LG) election on May 6, is scheduled to convene for its inaugural sitting tomorrow (16).

The gazette extraordinary in this regard was issued by the Commissioner of the Department of Local Government of the Western Province, Sarangika Jayasundara.

According to the gazette issued by the Commissioner, the inaugural sitting will commence at 9:30 a.m.

During the meeting scheduled to be held at the Town Hall, the election of the new Mayor and the Deputy Mayor will take place as the first order of business.

No party obtained an outright majority following the conduct of the LG election and therefore both the National People’s Power (NPP) and the Samagi Jana Balawegaya (SJB) have announced in recent days that they have secured the backing of other political factions to elect a Mayor.

According to the LG election results, the National People’s Power (NPP) secured 48 seats, the Samagi Jana Balawegaya (SJB) obtained 29 seats, the United National Party (UNP) won 13 seats, and the Sri Lanka Podujana Peramuna (SLPP) gained 5 seats.

Additionally, the Sri Lanka Muslim Congress received 4 seats, Independent Group No. 03 obtained three seats, the Sarvajana Balaya received two seats, and the United Peace Alliance also secured two seats according to the election results.

Independent Groups No. 04 and 05 received two seats each.

Furthermore, the United Republic Front, the National People’s Party, the National Freedom Front, the Podujana United Front, the Democratic National Alliance, Independent Group No. 01, and Independent Group No. 02 each received one seat.

However, to establish power in the Colombo Municipal Council, which consists of 117 seats, a party must secure at least 59 seats.

Accordingly, following the vote scheduled to be held tomorrow, the Mayor and Deputy Mayor of the Colombo Municipal Council will be appointed.

Decapitation strike: Israel’s silent war to dismantle State sovereignty

 

We are witnessing a new form of state conquest: not physical invasion, but intellectual destruction. By eliminating national brainpower, a state becomes paralysed, its institutions fragmented, and its sovereignty hollowed from within. Israel has mastered this doctrine earlier than most. Unlike old colonial models requiring troops, this model needs only intelligence superiority, targeted assassination capability, international legal immunity, and media control to shape global narratives. The world is being conditioned to accept such strikes as self-defence, while ignoring the strategic violations they represent

 

• Beyond Iran: The rise of clean warfare, intellectual targeting, and the new global architecture of control

 The world awoke to news of Israeli airstrikes targeting Iran. On the surface, it appeared to be another escalation in an already volatile Middle East. But for those observing the deep structure of global power, these were not ordinary attacks. Israel has crossed into a far more sophisticated form of warfare, one not focused on territory, but on systematically dismantling the intellectual and leadership architecture of its adversaries. This was not a general bombardment. This was a decapitation strike.

The reported deaths include not only military officers but senior members of Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), advanced nuclear scientists, and high-level strategic planners. 

These were the minds who formulated Iran’s defense posture, retaliation strategy, and long-term geopolitical alliances. Their removal sends Iran into operational paralysis. Historically, warfare aimed to capture land, destroy armies, and occupy capitals. But in the 21st century, real power lies in controlling how states think, plan, and respond. The removal of Iran’s key individuals is part of a broader strategy of disabling sovereign decision-making structures. When a state loses its brain centre, even temporarily, its ability to retaliate, negotiate, or maintain internal stability is compromised. Weapons without leadership are ineffective. Diplomatic channels without intellectual depth become hollow.

Silent consent

Israel has applied this doctrine before. The assassination of General Qassem Soleimani in 2020 (in coordination with the United States), and the killing of top nuclear scientist Mohsen Fakhrizadeh, followed the same model: eliminate the architects and disarm the system. The United States officially distanced itself from this most recent strike. But US personnel were evacuated from sensitive Middle East locations days before the operation. US satellites and regional intelligence almost certainly monitored and likely enabled the strikes. The removal of US troops prior to Israeli action is not the behaviour of a disinterested party. This is silent consent. The US-Israel military alliance operates on multiple levels: intelligence cooperation, weapons transfers, and strategic coordination. Public denials serve diplomatic theatre, while operational coordination remains intact.

What is perhaps most revealing is that neither Israel nor the United States express concern about international legal consequences. The United Nations remains silent. The International Criminal Court, despite issuing warrants against weaker states, takes no practical action. The global legal system, once designed to restrain state violence, has collapsed entirely when applied to Western allies and Zionist operations. This is not arrogance. This is calculated immunity. Israel operates with full confidence that no global tribunal will prosecute its leadership. The rules-based order applies selectively, to adversaries, not to allies.

Far more dangerous war

The consequences for Iran extend far beyond the loss of personnel. The removal of its top strategists creates multiple layers of vulnerability. With key commanders eliminated, coordinated decision-making is severely disrupted. High-level negotiations become weaker without experienced intellectual leadership. Leadership vacuums risk factionalism within Iran’s political structures. Israel’s timing creates a period where Iran is unable to respond decisively, allowing global narratives to normalize the strike. Iran now faces a far more dangerous war, not of weapons, but of leadership continuity and intellectual survivability.

This is not merely an Israel-Iran conflict. It is part of a long-term containment strategy where the ultimate target remains China. Iran’s role as a sovereign energy and strategic corridor to China’s Belt and Road Initiative has made it a permanent obstacle to Western and Zionist interests.

Neutralizing Iran weakens China’s western flank. The same strategy has unfolded through Syria’s destabilization, Lebanon’s economic collapse, and pressure on Russia’s partners. Independent power centers aligned with China are being systematically isolated through proxy conflicts, sanctions, regime change operations, or surgical eliminations of leadership. The strike on Iran fits directly into this multi-front preparation for confrontation between US-led alliances and emerging Eurasian blocs.

We are witnessing a new form of state conquest: not physical invasion, but intellectual destruction. By eliminating national brainpower, a state becomes paralyzed, its institutions fragmented, and its sovereignty hollowed from within. Israel has mastered this doctrine earlier than most. Unlike old colonial models requiring troops, this model needs only intelligence superiority, targeted assassination capability, international legal immunity, and media control to shape global narratives.

The world is being conditioned to accept such strikes as self-defense, while ignoring the strategic violations they represent.

Critical warning

For smaller states like Sri Lanka, these events offer a critical warning. Sovereignty is no longer defended only by borders and armies. It is protected by the survival of national intellect, independent leadership, and resistance to external ideological infiltration. Sri Lanka has faced its own forms of destabilization: regime changes, constitutional manipulations, economic coercion, and foreign policy interference. The Zionist doctrine applied to Iran is an extreme version of the same principle: neutralize leadership, and the state collapses quietly. As the global system moves into a more ruthless phase, small nations must strengthen their intellectual defenses alongside military preparedness. Survival depends not only on resisting invasions, but on preserving the state’s capacity to think independently.

Israel’s strike on Iran signals a dangerous evolution. We are witnessing the rise of clean warfare, no invasions, no occupations, but selective elimination of individuals carrying the strategic DNA of sovereign states. Iran is not defeated, but it has been strategically paralysed. Its ability to respond is crippled not by lack of weapons, but by absence of leadership to direct them. The world is moving toward open confrontation between global systems no longer governed by the old rules. The deeper question for all nations is simple: when the intellectual class is targeted, who remains to defend the state?

(The writer is a civilian intelligence architect and nationalist doctrine strategist, known for her analytical work on state sovereignty, global power structures, and strategic legal frameworks. Her writings offer deep investigations into the mechanisms of geopolitical influence, legal-state manipulation, and civilizational defense. She can be reached via email at jihan@jihanhameed.org)